| ??? 02/23/05 16:39 Read: times |
#88234 - A Case in point Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
even if Keil did have "seamless" inline assembler it would not be safe to assume that you could just set ACC and CY in 'C', fiddle about a bit with inline assembler, then recover ACC and CY into 'C' variables The following Keil thread provides an excellent illustration: http://www.keil.com/discuss/docs/thread5655.htm |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Rotating Carry (CY) through ACC in C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is a keyboard interface sub routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A51 to C51 interfacing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| inline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it does, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nevertheless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A Case in point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| shift first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using chainsaw to perform dental surgery | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ANSI C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| microcontroller C portability is a myth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Portability No .. Commonality Maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 |