| ??? 02/28/05 23:15 Read: times |
#88720 - re: Responding to: ???'s previous message |
to be honest i wouldnt have the first clue how to do that.
Ive just been thinking and i have an idea. Instead of using P1.0/T2 to control one of the pins for the l297 i can cut the track and link the pin from the l297 to 5v. then i can use port T2 for the second clock. Would that work ???? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 2 timers plus 9600 baud for serial | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8751 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fossil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| recommended | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| drop in | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mode 3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: fossil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So its a drop in replacement ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if thinking is too much | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: so its a drop in replacement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relatively ahead | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you might | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can not use a timer that is not there | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the result of incomplete | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clocks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clock source | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An Answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: an answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That one's a goner too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Clock" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simple, my dear Watson | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| T89C51 RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Plastic DIP ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| budget | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Budget | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89C51RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gladly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 |