Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/13/05 16:16
Read: times


 
#89578 - the dangers of thinking random is random
Responding to: ???'s previous message
There is no such thing as a random number in a uC without some form of external stimuli. Thinking that things such as the Keil rand() are random can lead you very far astray.
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=78680
In mosr cases (such as Keil) using the name "random" without "pseudo" is misleading, misinformed and absolutely wrong.

Erik


List of 21 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Randomization?            01/01/70 00:00      
   No RND op code in 8051/52            01/01/70 00:00      
   Random Number            01/01/70 00:00      
   random stuff            01/01/70 00:00      
      We can also count....            01/01/70 00:00      
      But Good Enough!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
      LC RNG            01/01/70 00:00      
      Random what?            01/01/70 00:00      
   maxim's lfsr            01/01/70 00:00      
   the dangers of thinking random is random            01/01/70 00:00      
   wibbly maths            01/01/70 00:00      
      Good old Galois Fields            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bet you didnt know            01/01/70 00:00      
            Try this link            01/01/70 00:00      
               While browsing            01/01/70 00:00      
   rand()            01/01/70 00:00      
      still pseudo            01/01/70 00:00      
         better pseudo!            01/01/70 00:00      
            rand() is part of stdlib.h            01/01/70 00:00      
               true, but not the point            01/01/70 00:00      
                  application dependent            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List