| ??? 03/14/05 22:00 Read: times |
#89677 - true, but not the point Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Grant Beattie said:
Rand is ... a pseudo-random number generator. My version of Keil states the same thing. That's not in dispute. Graham was just saying that the implementation of rand() was poor in some earlier versions of Keil C51; it was a poor implementation of a pseudo-random number generator, now it is a better implementation of a pseudo-random number generator - but it is, always was, and always will be only pseudo-random! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Randomization? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No RND op code in 8051/52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Random Number | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| random stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We can also count.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But Good Enough!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LC RNG | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Random what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maxim's lfsr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the dangers of thinking random is random | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| wibbly maths | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good old Galois Fields | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bet you didnt know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try this link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| While browsing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rand() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| still pseudo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| better pseudo! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| rand() is part of stdlib.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true, but not the point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
application dependent | 01/01/70 00:00 |