| ??? 03/31/05 16:27 Modified: 03/31/05 16:29 Read: times |
#90759 - one truth does not make another a lie Responding to: ???'s previous message |
His processor is not one of a group called 89C51Rx2. It is an AT89C51RD2 which is also one of a group of three near identical processors:
AT89C51RD2 AT89C51ED2 AT89C51ID2 which, as you see, cannot be described as members of a group called 89C51Rx2, but could be described as members of a group of processors called AT89C51xD2. The AT89C51RD2 is also a member of the group 89c51Rx2 comprising of P89C51RB2H P89C51RC2H P89C51RD2H P89C51RB2 P89C51RC2 P89C51RD2 T89C51RB2 T89C51RC2 T89C51RD2 AT89C51RB2 AT89C51RC2 AT89C51RD2 Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89C51RD2 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speeds?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Further Details of the RD2 Enviornment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Irrelevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure he is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I beg to differ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel product AT89C51RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is getting silly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're telling me. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| one truth does not make another a lie | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ridiculous meter goes off-scale | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cross posted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not ridiculus, just different opinions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lets try to discuss the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 |