Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/02/05 10:36
Read: times


 
#90861 - Working fine
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Furthermore it may not work at all, because 0FFh was not a valid SFR address on the 8051:
MOV MIRHEX1,0FFH


Not to worry. It worked fine in an instrument for almost a month, before I replaced the PCB with the right tracks and removed this routine altogether.

MOV MIRHEX1, 0FFH is made alright in the second statement in the CHKLUP routine with a INC MIRHEX1.

And you are right when you say this is the largest and slowest code to do the job on hand. I never mentioned otherwise.

And the reason I never bothered about these two aspects when I wrote it, was that the PCB was made and instrument had to be delivered. Size and speed penalty had no relevance in THAT application.

Thanks for pointing out though.

Raghu


List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Reversing Algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
   remembered this one            01/01/70 00:00      
      the fastest code in the west            01/01/70 00:00      
         Am I wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
            not as simple, but less table            01/01/70 00:00      
               lookup table            01/01/70 00:00      
                  nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                     swap, the nibble mirror            01/01/70 00:00      
                        nibble-wise?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     nope nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                        noipe, nope, nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                            noipe, nope, nope, nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ok, Ok. Ok, OK            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 max.255 entries - or the tricks :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    the value of verification            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Mirrored tracks            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Why ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Working fine            01/01/70 00:00      
                           why you post wrong code ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes. Code has bug - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 efficiency            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Obvious Vs Smart code            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          No offence - only learning            01/01/70 00:00      
   One byte-reversing solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   Byte Bit Reversal            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re: Byte Bit Reversal            01/01/70 00:00      
   Bit Addressing solution!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hardware?            01/01/70 00:00      
      2 byte of ram or 2 port?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Three ways:            01/01/70 00:00      
      Three (smart) ways            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks, Peter, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
         its faster            01/01/70 00:00      
   Topic has been discussed before            01/01/70 00:00      
   You could try a CPLD            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List