Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/02/05 12:28
Modified:
  04/02/05 12:29
Read: times


 		 #90867 - why you post wrong code ?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Raghunathan said:

Not to worry. It worked fine...


Not true on your example code !


Raghunathan said:

MOV MIRHEX1, 0FFH is made alright in the second statement in the CHKLUP routine with a INC MIRHEX1.


Please explain !

"INC MIRHEX1" and "MOV MIRHEX1, 0FFH" are fully different !

Maybe, if MIRHEX1 = 0FEh prior "INC MIRHEX1", then it change to 0FFh.
But the result of "MOV MIRHEX1, 0FFH" was always undefined, because 0FFh was no valid SFR location.


Why you post a different wrong working code ???

if you not used "MOV MIRHEX1, 0FFH", then write it not !

In general, write not such devilish example code, which has no defined results !


Peter


List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Reversing Algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
   remembered this one            01/01/70 00:00      
      the fastest code in the west            01/01/70 00:00      
         Am I wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
            not as simple, but less table            01/01/70 00:00      
               lookup table            01/01/70 00:00      
                  nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                     swap, the nibble mirror            01/01/70 00:00      
                        nibble-wise?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     nope nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                        noipe, nope, nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                            noipe, nope, nope, nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ok, Ok. Ok, OK            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 max.255 entries - or the tricks :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    the value of verification            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Mirrored tracks            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Why ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Working fine            01/01/70 00:00      
                           why you post wrong code ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes. Code has bug - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 efficiency            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Obvious Vs Smart code            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          No offence - only learning            01/01/70 00:00      
   One byte-reversing solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   Byte Bit Reversal            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re: Byte Bit Reversal            01/01/70 00:00      
   Bit Addressing solution!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hardware?            01/01/70 00:00      
      2 byte of ram or 2 port?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Three ways:            01/01/70 00:00      
      Three (smart) ways            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks, Peter, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
         its faster            01/01/70 00:00      
   Topic has been discussed before            01/01/70 00:00      
   You could try a CPLD            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List