Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/04/05 14:28
Read: times


 		 #90965 - max.255 entries - or the tricks :-)
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The problem is mentioned in bible:
chapter 1, page 8 said:
This type of table can have up to 255 entries,
numbered 1 through 255. Number 0 cannot be used, because at the
time the MOVC instruction is executed, the PC contains the address
of the RET instruction. An entry numbered 0 would be the RET
opcode itself.
And, using INC, input 0FFh would turn into 0...

Erik, I think, you work in C long enough to stop thinking in the low level way (no offence). On the other hand, if somebody presents me a more complex problem, being stuck in asm, I would probably have troubles to properly break it down into sub-tasks, set up data structures, etc...

Jan Waclawek


List of 36 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Reversing Algorithm            01/01/70 00:00      
   remembered this one            01/01/70 00:00      
      the fastest code in the west            01/01/70 00:00      
         Am I wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
            not as simple, but less table            01/01/70 00:00      
               lookup table            01/01/70 00:00      
                  nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                     swap, the nibble mirror            01/01/70 00:00      
                        nibble-wise?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     nope nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                        noipe, nope, nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                            noipe, nope, nope, nope            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ok, Ok. Ok, OK            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 max.255 entries - or the tricks :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    the value of verification            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Mirrored tracks            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Why ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Working fine            01/01/70 00:00      
                           why you post wrong code ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes. Code has bug - Peter            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 efficiency            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Obvious Vs Smart code            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          No offence - only learning            01/01/70 00:00      
   One byte-reversing solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   Byte Bit Reversal            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re: Byte Bit Reversal            01/01/70 00:00      
   Bit Addressing solution!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hardware?            01/01/70 00:00      
      2 byte of ram or 2 port?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Three ways:            01/01/70 00:00      
      Three (smart) ways            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks, Peter, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
         its faster            01/01/70 00:00      
   Topic has been discussed before            01/01/70 00:00      
   You could try a CPLD            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List