Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/15/05 10:34
Read: times


 
#91615 - 'Stub' resistors missing?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Muhammad Fauzan said:
See what ATMEL has to say on their App Note. BTW, they also included a sample program. The Application note is for EEPROM 24Cxx but you can modify it for another I2C components.


What I don't see on their scheme, is the 100 ohm 'stub' resistors (how do you call those things in English???) on the SDA and SCL lines of the two devices.

Forgotten?

Best rgds,

--Geert

List of 28 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Bit Bang i2c            01/01/70 00:00      
   You should            01/01/70 00:00      
      Errr            01/01/70 00:00      
      a slight problem            01/01/70 00:00      
   I was            01/01/70 00:00      
      Licence            01/01/70 00:00      
         call it SMB            01/01/70 00:00      
            maybe different            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Correction!            01/01/70 00:00      
         SETB SDA            01/01/70 00:00      
            misunderstanding?            01/01/70 00:00      
         re:            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thanks to Atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
      'Stub' resistors missing?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Pull ups ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not those...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Rp            01/01/70 00:00      
                  IIC is owned by philips why not go there            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You're right!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Set port as input - NO SUCH THING!            01/01/70 00:00      
      oh yes there is            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes, but not here?            01/01/70 00:00      
         nowhere in the documentation            01/01/70 00:00      
            one more reason not to rely on testing            01/01/70 00:00      
               one more reason not to rely on testing            01/01/70 00:00      
               Catch 'em young ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List