??? 04/15/05 10:34 Read: times |
#91615 - 'Stub' resistors missing? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Muhammad Fauzan said:
See what ATMEL has to say on their App Note. BTW, they also included a sample program. The Application note is for EEPROM 24Cxx but you can modify it for another I2C components. What I don't see on their scheme, is the 100 ohm 'stub' resistors (how do you call those things in English???) on the SDA and SCL lines of the two devices. Forgotten? Best rgds, --Geert |
Topic | Author | Date |
Bit Bang i2c | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You should | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Errr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a slight problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I was | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Licence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
call it SMB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe different | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Correction! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SETB SDA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
misunderstanding? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks to Atmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'Stub' resistors missing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pull ups ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not those... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rp | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IIC is owned by philips why not go there | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You're right! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Set port as input - NO SUCH THING! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oh yes there is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, but not here? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nowhere in the documentation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one more reason not to rely on testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one more reason not to rely on testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Catch 'em young ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |