| ??? 05/16/05 04:10 Read: times |
#93463 - A very nice storing/erasing method Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mehdi said:
is this difference for erasing algorithm Dan said:
You then have 999 locations occupied and 1 available. Yes,i said not clearly it in my first post Any phone number has a priority rather than previous we must consider this parameter, in this situation it seems 2 first byte have to reserved for priority and when erasing a phone number all priority numbers must be decreased one and the biggest+1 stored in erased memory Dan,I reach to one nice storing method with help of you You are worthy getting +1 from me Mehdi |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| difference between two same task! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erase time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A few things to think about | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clearing a flag or mem pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same principle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erase and Replacement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: replacement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A very nice storing/erasing method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A very nice storing/erasing method | 01/01/70 00:00 |