??? 05/25/05 13:09 Read: times |
#93888 - Read the Comment Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Donald Catto said:
"Pointer Notation and array Notaion are interchangable."
Amazing. Dan posts a link to the comp.lang.c faq on this very topic then someone comes along and makes a completely misleading statement like that. The FAQ link is about why a pointer is not the same as an array; Neil's point is that, although pointers & arrays are different, they both use the same Notation. Sounds fair enough to me... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Unions in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You miss the point completely... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Easy with Union | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You can see from the Raghu example... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Platform-dependence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Padding in unions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
portability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
array=pointer...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
array != pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Quirk of C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Read the FAQ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Read the Comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Read everything | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Looks the same to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This One | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Good example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Of course it does! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actually, even less. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
O.K you win | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Please conclude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not Exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
End of wrong stick?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |