??? 06/13/05 12:49 Read: times |
#94785 - low power MCUs Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Probably TI MSP430 (although I never tried them).
These are claimed to be low consumption; '51s are not. Also some of the Microchip PICs are not bad, especially at very low frequencies. They at least publish consumption data over wide operation frequency and voltage. '51 vendors often don't, or specify them only for the highest operation frequencies (as is the case e.g. for LPC932). Jan Waclawek |
Topic | Author | Date |
Minimizing port pin currents | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Old threas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thread Vs Reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What would be good | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for me it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: for me it does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No worry... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry, I misinterpreted Musharraf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
low power | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TI ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Total agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
low power MCUs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
App notes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Any link for low power appnote? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Damn all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
static current? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
very low frequencies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it's not just CMOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Biasing generator for the substrate? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
flash? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
consumption overview | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SiLabs Wins Then? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't know![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do worry! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
High impedance | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Battery powered circuits | 01/01/70 00:00 |