| ??? 06/16/05 07:27 Modified: 06/16/05 07:28 Read: times |
#95069 - Linker's Job Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It is not the job of the compiler to assign absolute addresses - that's the Linker's[1] job.
So, let the Compiler to its job - defining the object and its initialisation - and leave the job of fixing the address to the Linker, where it belongs! The Link given by Oleg tells you how! [1] Strictly, it's the Locator's job, but the Keil Linkers combine the functions of Linker & Locator. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Const Array Store at a Specific Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Initializing constant location. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| KEIL uVision 2 C51 6.10 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Linker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linking Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cannot you use something like.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems it cannot be done in C with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Done in 'C' with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Intel Hex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Accessing Code Arrarys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why so complicated? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Memory space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No can do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To Steve/Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Punisment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'll just nip nack to last week and... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I have the impression that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small problem with this that many have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const | 01/01/70 00:00 |