Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/17/05 15:10
Modified:
  06/17/05 15:14

Read: times


 
#95175 - I have the impression that
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
Nobody want to punish a honest mistake,
Andy said:
Nobody's asking for nor giving "punishment"
As I've said before, the score refers to the post, not the poster


I have the impression that a large percentage of members see it as reflecting on the poster. I am sorry that I got suckered into that mode of thinking.

Erik



List of 27 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Const Array Store at a Specific Address            01/01/70 00:00      
   Initializing constant location.            01/01/70 00:00      
      KEIL uVision 2 C51 6.10            01/01/70 00:00      
         No Linker?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Linking Mike            01/01/70 00:00      
               Linker's Job            01/01/70 00:00      
   Cannot you use something like....            01/01/70 00:00      
      in fact            01/01/70 00:00      
      Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
   seems it cannot be done in C with Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
      Done in 'C' with Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
   Linker job            01/01/70 00:00      
      Linker's Job            01/01/70 00:00      
   Intel Hex            01/01/70 00:00      
   Accessing Code Arrarys            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why so complicated?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Memory space            01/01/70 00:00      
            Oops!            01/01/70 00:00      
               No can do            01/01/70 00:00      
               To Steve/Craig            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Punisment?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I'll just nip nack to last week and...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Some would            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I have the impression that            01/01/70 00:00      
   a small problem with this that many have            01/01/70 00:00      
   using constant            01/01/70 00:00      
      const            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List