??? 06/17/05 15:05 Read: times |
#95171 - Some would Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"Perhaps the 20-minute edit timeout should just be removed?"
I think threads would become incomprehensible Some would, In other fora with "unlimited edits" you have the question following the answer as the answer has been entered as an edit to the original post. e.g. original "my controller ... " next post "which controller" original edited to "My AT89C51RD2 ..." so now you have "My AT89C51RD2 ..." next post "which controller" Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Const Array Store at a Specific Address | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Initializing constant location. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
KEIL uVision 2 C51 6.10 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No Linker? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linking Mike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cannot you use something like.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
in fact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
seems it cannot be done in C with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Done in 'C' with Keil | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linker job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linker's Job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Intel Hex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Accessing Code Arrarys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why so complicated? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Memory space | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Oops! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No can do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
To Steve/Craig | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Punisment? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'll just nip nack to last week and... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some would | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I have the impression that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a small problem with this that many have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using constant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
const![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |