| ??? 07/05/05 08:04 Read: times |
#96580 - well... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
If you wrote it, so it's probably still software.
What about soldering it up for the real hardware? Jan Waclawek CPLD and FPGA are real hardware Jan, and are very useful. VHDL is a very nice language as soon as you don't forget there is a 'D' for description in the name and some old style syntax. You can always use one of the high level hardware description languages like systemC, C-ugh ..., they will give you a VHDL output wihtout having to think about parralelism, and will allow you to use a softcore mips, a bus and bcu, some itc and a few banks of ram to do what you could have done with an hundred macrocells in VHDL. FPGAs are the future of specialised computer systems. Best regards Benjamin |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Decoding manchester with only capture in | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the non-trivial excursion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily error | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bit more about ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does this helps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its not software Jim | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Who's Jim? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My example code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My idea used in past on 68332 TPU | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It all becomes clearer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The answer.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| problem in manchester decoding using pca | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| problem in manchester decoding using pca | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
problem in manchester decoding using pca | 01/01/70 00:00 |