??? 07/16/05 16:47 Read: times |
#97495 - Why Assembler? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Pradono Antyanto said:
This topic is using assembler code with 8052. The page Dan cited said:
FLC can perhaps be best classified as a high-level programming paradigm ... Difficult to program ... FLC requires some numerical manipulations This doesn't sound to me like a job for a novice assembler programmer. Wouldn't you be better at least starting it in 'C'? If the performance in 'C' is inadequate, you could think about optimising the critical bits - although that still requires significant skill and experience in assembler. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Fuzzy logic using 8052... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lots of fuzz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tehnique | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Possible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
example questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why Assembler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My spec is assembler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
didide and conquer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alrighty then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ooo...my god | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fool me once... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to Dan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rigel link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Lots of fuzz (link) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some suggestions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yup... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
To James | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Rigel service improved? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some tips. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Matlab first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank You Andres | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fuzzy logic is still being used? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Absolutely, Andy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Real world![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fuzzy logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Finish | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
comp.ai.fuzzy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Byte Craft Fuzz-C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nice Link:) | 01/01/70 00:00 |