| ??? 08/01/05 10:50 Read: times |
#98567 - Source code useless Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
I have not seen any, is it standalone or integrated with the compiler/linker/whatever other tool? I've seen them separate - dunno about anything specifically for the 8051, though. :-( My point is, the compiler knows what is the source/it's "fundamental" blocks ... My point is that this is of no use whatever - what you require can only be done by examining the generated code. ... and the corresponding assembler output so the compiler is the best place where I would expect to such "profiling" should be integrated into. Actually, that's not quite true - things like Keil's LX51 Linker & the Raisonance CodeCompressor can perform further optimisations after the compiler has finished! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Counting cycles... possible in C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need a Profiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The compiler knows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Source code useless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's why you need Assembler! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nohohoho | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speed is not everything! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cycles vary? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutely, but what good does it do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, the things posted apply in this cas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exactly for this reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how can you automate that it is small en | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use Microsoft Excel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excel and conditional branches ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That makes absolutotally no difference, | 01/01/70 00:00 |