| ??? 08/01/05 13:23 Read: times |
#98586 - Yes, the things posted apply in this cas Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Still looks useless?
Yes, the things posted apply in this case as well. Using the example you give, someone using a cycle counter and C makjes the routine just squeeze into the allotted time. Now two years later someone, for valid reasons, optimize for size (which usually makes code slower) and BOOM. Also, it is not uncommon that a new release of a compiler is slower in a few places due to code changes that makes it more efficient in many other places. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Counting cycles... possible in C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need a Profiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The compiler knows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Source code useless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's why you need Assembler! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nohohoho | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speed is not everything! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cycles vary? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutely, but what good does it do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, the things posted apply in this cas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exactly for this reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how can you automate that it is small en | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use Microsoft Excel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excel and conditional branches ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That makes absolutotally no difference, | 01/01/70 00:00 |