| ??? 08/01/05 10:56 Read: times |
#98568 - That's why you need Assembler! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
... the major drawback is, that you need to perform the simulation/cycle counting each time whan you recompile That is why you'd use Assembler - then you'd know that it would stay the same unless you specifically changed it. while the integrated "profiler" will return the up-to-date result upon each compilation. But you'd still need to check the "profiler's" result each time to ensure that it was still acceptable. Again, if the timing is so critical as to need this, then you really should be writing it in assembler - so that you know it won't change unless you specifically make it change! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Counting cycles... possible in C? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need a Profiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The compiler knows | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Source code useless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's why you need Assembler! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nohohoho | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speed is not everything! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cycles vary? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutely, but what good does it do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, the things posted apply in this cas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| exactly for this reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how can you automate that it is small en | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use Microsoft Excel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| excel and conditional branches ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That makes absolutotally no difference, | 01/01/70 00:00 |