| ??? 04/08/07 17:09 Read: times |
#136816 - XA Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Quite some time ago at an NXP (formerly Philips) Seminar - some one possed the XA question.. and the Philips App's engineers suggested that for new designs price / features LPC2000 ARM7 was recommended over XA designs (where possible).
The ARM7 wins hands down for price vs features vs flash size vs tool sets vs industry acceptance. 12~18 months after the seminar quite a few XA's went EOL (End Of Life). Seems the Philps Guys advised correctly to the original question. Joe |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| ESC Trip Report – The Eighty Fifty What? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Was Maxim/Dallas unrepresented? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well talking to a guy the other day | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Won't the ARM do that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure ARMs can do that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ARMv5TE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| slugs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm on #2... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We had an ARM9 that did it, too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why would they push the '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What about "embedded" 8051s? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you can get a 90s2313 softcore | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There are numerous PIC soft-cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| embedded processors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No kidding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about an XA replacement? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NXP and XA Replacement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| XA | 01/01/70 00:00 |