| ??? 02/14/08 11:03 Read: times |
#150806 - Good point Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Christoph Franck said:
...common compilers will not attempt to fit the ISR in the 8 byte slot, but instead just emit a long jump (takes time) to the actual ISR. Not sure what Keil does on this... See also: http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=150792 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Minimum ISR time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "bible" time? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re-expalin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: Minimum ISR time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what simple ISR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're right, it is bloody C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C and ISRs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Know thy tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
'using' can be counterproductive in SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISRs in C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good point | 01/01/70 00:00 |