| ??? 08/30/05 15:11 Read: times |
#100295 - both? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
IMHO both methods aim at something slightly different - while the series termination is supposed to decrease EMI radiation (due to reflections/ringing on the cable); the ferrite rings are supposed mainly to decrease RF intake (see Erik's remark on cables crossing powerful switching supplies).
Shielded twisted pair works well for both, but the quality of shield varies wildly... But as I am completely stupid on EMC, please correct me if I am wrong. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| driving ribboncabel - ESD precautions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| on interconnect | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| comments. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Recommended scheme | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 74H? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't forget series termination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| series termination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: series termination | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an, in my opinion, much better way is to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Series termination is the correct method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| both? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Series termination prevents overshot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Huh Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read the original post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Think about the newbies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That is exacltly why I always push the u | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RS485 is a good alternative, indeed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use a relay driver and sleep well ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ferite bead, series termination, or | 01/01/70 00:00 |