??? 10/17/05 21:34 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Informative |
#102516 - Triad versus Competition Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Cypress PSoC & Anadigm are more-like parameterizable blocks of filter sections. That's fine if your problem fits cleanly into their available blocks and all you need to do is tweak the nobs. Our approach is a medium-grained mix of OpAmps and support circuitry that you design with the way you would on a printed circuit board (OpAmps, R, C, Analog Switches). And, our building blocks can be assembled into higher-order functions such as Sigma-Delta Modulators, SARs, ADCs, R2R DACs, C2C DACs, etc.
Also, the PSoc and Anadigm solutions are considerably more expensive on the Power and Price curves. The advantage that these solutions have over Triad is that they are field programmable. Fusion should be good competition for PSoC and Anadigm because it may be field-programmable analog done better...so far...just marketing material so I can't say much more than that. Still going to be pretty expensive for all but smallest of volumes due to FPGA routing fabric. The Zetex solution was more a sea of transistors solution and most users found it very difficult to design with. Our approach lets you design more at a databook level. Of course you can do more by using switched capacitor structures but you don't have to in order to just get started. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Mixed Signal 8051 Platform | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ah well..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
although | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IP Ownership and Pricing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IP Distribution and Protection![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An example... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TL052AM OpAmp Performance?... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Competition? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Triad versus Competition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PSoC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Triad Analog Performance versus PSoC | 01/01/70 00:00 |