Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/26/06 00:52
Read: times


 
#113100 - it's not the number of IC's
Responding to: ???'s previous message
It's the capacitance on each IC. I'm not telling you whether or not to use buffering, but I am telling you that when you hook more than 4 or 5 IC's AND a cable to your signals, they probaly need buffering, and the only way to tell is to compute the total capacitance and the examine how long it takes the MCU to charge the capacitance in order to tell how long it takes the signal to settle to a valid level. If you use any such signal as a clock, you'd best ensure that the risetime for the clock input is met, too, else you'll need a schmitt-trigger buffer, e.g. 74HC541 or HC244. If a buffer results in a shorter settling time, then you'd best use it. If it computes as "on the edge," the maybe doing without it will work. My attitude is "when in doubt, leave it out," but there are circumstances when it's best to go the other way, such as when you don't know whether there will be more load later on.

Buffers on EVERY signal are definitely indicated whenever more than one board, especially if they're connected with cables, is involved. The clamping diodes on their inputs will help manage any ringing that occurs due to signal path disconinuities, and the like. You might also want to add terminating diodes (74S1053) at the end of the signal path, e.g. at the last expansion connector in a series.

I don't know why you'd want to go with such a small SRAM. I don't know where you'd buy them. The smallest I was able to find about three years ago were 32Kx8's and those were 8 ns parts. They were not very costly. Lately, I've used 64Kx8 parts at 5 volts (61512A-15). Those were acquired as surplus cache RAM's from a former PC vendor's cache stock. They once were found in groups of four on old '486 motherboards.

In over 40 years I've accumulated fewer than a dozen faulty RAM chips of all sorts. Usually it's something else. be sure there's no slack in your wires, BTW. You should never bundle your wires. If you wire "shortest-path" the random interaction will cancel out, only slightly raising the noise floor, while bundling will exacerbate crosstalk, since bundled wires tend to be arranged such that they change at the same time. That causes longer settling times.

RE



List of 78 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Help me - 8052 SBC project !            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why Not?            01/01/70 00:00      
      wheel-reinvention gone mad!            01/01/70 00:00      
      RoHS?            01/01/70 00:00      
         An EU concern            01/01/70 00:00      
         the other side of ROHS            01/01/70 00:00      
      Reasons - 101 !            01/01/70 00:00      
         Can you buy from India?            01/01/70 00:00      
         leave the guy alone            01/01/70 00:00      
         another illusion            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: another illusion            01/01/70 00:00      
   Wire-wrap??????            01/01/70 00:00      
      Not quite so ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         A very bad signal to beginners!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Nope ... that's the wrong signal            01/01/70 00:00      
               And what about EMC?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Just exactly who cares about it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Just exactly who cares about it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Where do you buy them?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Consumer Vs Comercial            01/01/70 00:00      
                           emphasizing a point            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Yes            01/01/70 00:00      
   2 RAMs?            01/01/70 00:00      
      I see another "illusion"            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: I see another "illusion"            01/01/70 00:00      
            There's another approach            01/01/70 00:00      
   Schematics !            01/01/70 00:00      
      /EA not connected !            01/01/70 00:00      
         To ground!            01/01/70 00:00      
            U1 = AT89C52            01/01/70 00:00      
               Ok            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: /EA not connected !            01/01/70 00:00      
   i see no comment on this            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: i see no comment on this            01/01/70 00:00      
         Very unsafe, it does not give a "long wr            01/01/70 00:00      
            7.37mhz??            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: 7.37mhz??            01/01/70 00:00      
                  But why are you reporting...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: But why are you reporting...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        simple things            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Wouldn't it be more helpful            01/01/70 00:00      
                              the reason mainly is "students"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I agree completely but here's the thing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    that is not the issue            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       There's teaching and there's preaching            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          that's the crux            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Complaining won't help.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                where is the difference?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Not much of the time            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      OK, I realized that just after I posted            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         We have to think of the children            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            a response            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               I don't recommend that sort of thing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          RE: There's teaching & there's preaching            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 RE: the reason mainly is "students"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    that lazy people exist does not mean you            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       RE: that lazy people exist does not mean            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          OOPS            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             RE: OOPS            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                risky            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bus contention!!            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Bus contention!!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Answers            01/01/70 00:00      
               Run the numbers.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Run the numbers.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Please try a lower clock frequency!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Vcc_2            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: Vcc_2            01/01/70 00:00      
                     it's not the number of IC's            01/01/70 00:00      
                     D1 = 1N4100 ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Would that be a 1N4001?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Reason of buffering            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Reason of buffering            01/01/70 00:00      
                     use a scope            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why would that be?            01/01/70 00:00      
   You might want to use a register            01/01/70 00:00      
   8255: RIP            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List