Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/16/06 07:51
Read: times


 
#116290 - solution
Responding to: ???'s previous message
For those compilers (and most of the assemblers) which don't support straighforward way from the SFR(x,y) definition to an expandable macro, I'd suggest to write a custom preprocessor.

Given the sfr file will have a simple syntax (one definition per line etc.) so it is easy to parse it, to write such a preprocessor is a semitrivial task.

So it will end up as an extra line in the makefile or .bat file.

Just an idea.

Jan Waclawek

List of 31 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
predefined macros and sfr definitions            01/01/70 00:00      
   old Tasking version            01/01/70 00:00      
      Tasking            01/01/70 00:00      
         Here's what I have            01/01/70 00:00      
            reference            01/01/70 00:00      
   no aswer, but an extra question            01/01/70 00:00      
      assembler macros            01/01/70 00:00      
         not really            01/01/70 00:00      
   I doubt it - but            01/01/70 00:00      
      End of wrong stick?            01/01/70 00:00      
         OK "any", not "ant", but "8051-derivativ            01/01/70 00:00      
            Unfair            01/01/70 00:00      
               can be argued            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No unfair intentions            01/01/70 00:00      
                     universality is not desired            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's especially all those installs            01/01/70 00:00      
                     They happily coexist at my place            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Uninstalling            01/01/70 00:00      
   Dunfield            01/01/70 00:00      
      Dunfield AppNotes            01/01/70 00:00      
         DDS            01/01/70 00:00      
         if it is asm            01/01/70 00:00      
         what's the big deal?            01/01/70 00:00      
            solution            01/01/70 00:00      
   First try            01/01/70 00:00      
      a couple of problems (for me)            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
            Sometimes even using things for "what it            01/01/70 00:00      
            Common Practice            01/01/70 00:00      
               nasty is relative            01/01/70 00:00      
         Limitations            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List