??? 06/30/06 18:37 Read: times |
#119487 - It's probably correct, but not complete Responding to: ???'s previous message |
There are no binaries ... I'm looking carefully at the correspondence between the bits in the opcode and the operation of the core. The binaries are needed for that.
Unfortunately, I've found a few of the Dallas table entries are just not right. I'll have to compare them with a few others, just to make sure of whether it's the binaries or the hex codes that are wrong in the Dallas table. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
User Guide "inconsistencies" in DS89C4x0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you code in C you better hope this on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's probably correct, but not complete | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No binary equivalent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Click on the op code to get the binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No doubt![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |