??? 07/01/06 22:55 Read: times |
#119523 - No doubt Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I've no doubt that all the information is available and useable. What I'm presently doing is pulling it all together into the document that I need for my next step, and that means I have to generate a table that has each bit (binary, of course) in its own column. I can use the Keil chart to verify the HEX and that's adequate to whether the values in the Dallas chart are correct. From that I easily can derive the binary. It's just not there in a readily useable (for my purposes) form.
RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
User Guide "inconsistencies" in DS89C4x0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you code in C you better hope this on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's probably correct, but not complete | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No binary equivalent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Click on the op code to get the binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No doubt![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |