??? 06/30/06 22:09 Read: times |
#119494 - No binary equivalent Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Since that's where some of the errors appear in the Dallas version. It's not readily apparent, on the face of it, whether the binary or the hex is what's in error.
RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
User Guide "inconsistencies" in DS89C4x0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if you code in C you better hope this on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's probably correct, but not complete | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No binary equivalent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Click on the op code to get the binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No doubt![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |