??? 07/05/06 13:37 Read: times |
#119675 - Observation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joseph Hebert said:
Maybe I misread Satish's original post, but it didn't sound like he was asking a question, just sharing an observation instead. And what observation would that be? It's not a very useful observation, as the specific compiler used is not mentioned, the specific error message produced is not mentioned, and no suggestion is given for the reason why an error is reported. Should be all post random flawed code fragments saying just, "this gives as error"...? |
Topic | Author | Date |
bit variable using struct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Which compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Insuffiicient Info; Post formatted code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Asking for help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
showing lack of discipline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sbit and BData | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sbit and BData - code formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
16 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more hint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Std C bitfields != Keil bit-addresssable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What this guy said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another example of two things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The problem with bitfields | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Granted![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |