??? 07/06/06 17:32 Read: times |
#119758 - another example of two things Responding to: ???'s previous message |
As a rule I avoid structs of bit fields for that very reason. Plus they are terribly inefficient and end up doing the shifts ands and ors that you would do by hand anyway.
another example of two things 1) do not approach the '51 with a 'C is C' attitude. 2) that something can be done does not necessarily make it right to do it. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
bit variable using struct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Which compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Insuffiicient Info; Post formatted code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Asking for help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
showing lack of discipline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sbit and BData | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
sbit and BData - code formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
16 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
more hint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Std C bitfields != Keil bit-addresssable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What this guy said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another example of two things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The problem with bitfields | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Granted![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |