| ??? 07/06/06 19:52 Read: times |
#119779 - Granted Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The problem with bitfields extends beyond the 8051.
Grant ed (bad pun) but is accentuated by the '51 having superior bit processing which get disabled by the 'C is C' attitude. I do not know how bad the bit processing would be bitfield vs 'discrete code' on a processor with no '51like bit processing capability, but I doubt the difference would be anything close to what it is on a '51, more likely it would be none. with a good compiler. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| bit variable using struct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insuffiicient Info; Post formatted code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Asking for help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| showing lack of discipline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sbit and BData | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sbit and BData - code formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more hint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Std C bitfields != Keil bit-addresssable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What this guy said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another example of two things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The problem with bitfields | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Granted | 01/01/70 00:00 |