| ??? 07/06/06 17:29 Read: times |
#119756 - What this guy said Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Especially:
The bit field is a standard part of the 'C' language (although their implementation is notoriously non-standard). As a rule I avoid structs of bit fields for that very reason. Plus they are terribly inefficient and end up doing the shifts ands and ors that you would do by hand anyway. GB |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| bit variable using struct | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which compiler? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Insuffiicient Info; Post formatted code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Asking for help? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| showing lack of discipline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sbit and BData | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sbit and BData - code formatted | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more hint | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Std C bitfields != Keil bit-addresssable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What this guy said | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another example of two things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The problem with bitfields | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Granted | 01/01/70 00:00 |