| ??? 07/26/06 08:57 Read: times |
#121056 - unofficial history of 8051 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Satish S Munot said:
I will like to known how long we see the feature of 8051 architecher? 26 years, according to Intel's official chronology (although it seems that some samples were around already in 1979 (?)) After this discussion I stitched together[shameless advertisement]the unofficial history of '51 (including some '48 stuff) here[/shameless advertisement]. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| How long we see 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| unofficial history of 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| History, or prediction? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It seems to gain, not lose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Does it matter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Double negative? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Defintely 'C'! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yeah, let's flame! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Defintely 'C'! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| arguments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An example for 8051/AVR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| contra-example for 8051/AVR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A slight mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| stdint.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's your trouble, then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Compiler independant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C is not better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bringing 2 togethert | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Opening pandora's box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for a beginner ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are You sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Portability and scars | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm an ASM Guru but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why discuss the rare exception tha same apply | 01/01/70 00:00 |