??? 07/27/06 09:11 Read: times |
#121149 - Defintely 'C'! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
@Jan,
my practical experience was exactly opposite. I like C, because reusing code on another CPU was many times easier. I use lot of code almost unchanged on different architectures, e.g. key debouncing, UART-buffering, software RTC+calendar, 1-wire, I2C, CAN and many others on 8051, AVR, ARM. Also I test often new algorithm with Borland-C before I use it on the 8051. If you have difficulties to reuse code, I suspect your writing style was not modular. Its not uncommon for me, that also small projects (AT89C4051) consist of 10 or more object files. I see also no difference to translate big or small projects, both are many times easier under C. I agree only in one point, translating code from big machines with gulping big memory down to 8-bit machines may be hard. But the reverse direction on originally written 8-bit code was easy. Peter |
Topic | Author | Date |
How long we see 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unofficial history of 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
History, or prediction? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It seems to gain, not lose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Does it matter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Double negative? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Defintely 'C'! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yeah, let's flame! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Defintely 'C'! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
arguments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An example for 8051/AVR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
contra-example for 8051/AVR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A slight mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stdint.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's your trouble, then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler independant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C is not better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bringing 2 togethert | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Opening pandora's box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for a beginner ...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
are You sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Portability and scars | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm an ASM Guru but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why discuss the rare exception tha same apply | 01/01/70 00:00 |