??? 07/27/06 10:44 Read: times |
#121157 - C is not better Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
This perfectly illustrates the point that it's not the language that matters ('C', assembler, whatever), but the skill and experience of the programmer. Yeah, yeah. This is what I am talking about all the time, isn't it. - gcc made an unexpected retyping (expansion) and sign extension when shifting I think you'll find that this is all standard 'C' behaviour, or documented implementation-specific behaviour. Thanks, but no, thanks. This sinks the "C is portable" into the "myths" even deeper, doesn't it. Jan Waclawek |
Topic | Author | Date |
How long we see 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
unofficial history of 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
History, or prediction? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It seems to gain, not lose | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Does it matter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Double negative? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
to C or not to C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Defintely 'C'! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yeah, let's flame! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Defintely 'C'! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
arguments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
An example for 8051/AVR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
contra-example for 8051/AVR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A slight mistake | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
stdint.h | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
That's your trouble, then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Compiler independant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
C is not better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
bringing 2 togethert | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Opening pandora's box | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Learning C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
for a beginner ...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
are You sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Portability and scars | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm an ASM Guru but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why discuss the rare exception tha same apply | 01/01/70 00:00 |