Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/28/06 08:12
Read: times


 
#121244 - matrix
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The point is to spare output pins/drivers.

So you connect the LEDs into a matrix. Then you light up the needed LEDs only in one row at a time - in step one light up required LEDs only in first row, in step two light up required LEDs only in second row etc. - and repeat this in a fast rate, one full cycle (a "frame") within less than say 1/50 second. The persistence of vision makes your brain believe, that all of the rows are lighted up at once.

The moving sign is the same as TV - you simply change the pattern of light-up LEDs in each frame.

This is just the basic principle; it has many many pitfalls and problems - have a look e.g. at Payam's LED sign project - it has been discussed in hundreds of posts already here.

Jan Waclawek


List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
matrix LED logic            01/01/70 00:00      
   Did you see this thread?            01/01/70 00:00      
      About project            01/01/70 00:00      
         Start a new thread!            01/01/70 00:00      
   just curious            01/01/70 00:00      
      No homework this is.            01/01/70 00:00      
         matrix            01/01/70 00:00      
            the urban legend about matrix            01/01/70 00:00      
               Erik, do you...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  almost            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     EMI and PWM for brightness control            01/01/70 00:00      
                        EMI            01/01/70 00:00      
               OK, there are also other reasons...            01/01/70 00:00      
         so, no purpose at all            01/01/70 00:00      
         Why don't you search first, Ashwin?            01/01/70 00:00      
   LED/lights matrix            01/01/70 00:00      
      actually            01/01/70 00:00      
         I knew there is a better expression...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I understood you!            01/01/70 00:00      
               both are equally right ... it\'s retinal persitence            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s strange...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Number of \"\\\" is doubling, each time I modify!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        some kinda weird escape character            01/01/70 00:00      
   Sorry... (no message)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Which logic?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Lighting logic.            01/01/70 00:00      
         You could have said that earlier!            01/01/70 00:00      
   read \'Hurley\'            01/01/70 00:00      
      :(            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bad ISBN?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Amazon            01/01/70 00:00      
   Two-year-old thread revived!!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List