Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/28/06 15:32
Modified:
  07/28/06 15:35

Read: times


 
#121269 - the urban legend about matrix
Responding to: ???'s previous message
There is an urban legend that if you do many LEDs you should multiplex them. If the LEDs are not high power, that is pure baloney.

as an example, let us take a 8*8 matrix

to multiplex, you need
a high side latch (8 I/O pins)
8 transistors for high side
a low side latch (8 I/O pins)
8 low side transistors (MPX = 8* the current)

non-multiplexed you need
8 shift registers from a family that has enough oomp to drive the leds (e.g. AHC 10mA (75ma/package), ALS 24mA 2221 50mA) and 3 I/O pins.

so the difference is
16 transistors and 17 I/O pins
or
6 registers and 3 pins.

That does not sound like a great trade (well it is not that bad) but add to the multiplexed method a) the siftware iverhead and b) what hardware you have to add because your matrix used up the I/O pins.

or, of course, you can use dedicated LED drivers such as the SITI ST2221A which will give yoi constant current drive.

Erik

List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
matrix LED logic            01/01/70 00:00      
   Did you see this thread?            01/01/70 00:00      
      About project            01/01/70 00:00      
         Start a new thread!            01/01/70 00:00      
   just curious            01/01/70 00:00      
      No homework this is.            01/01/70 00:00      
         matrix            01/01/70 00:00      
            the urban legend about matrix            01/01/70 00:00      
               Erik, do you...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  almost            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     EMI and PWM for brightness control            01/01/70 00:00      
                        EMI            01/01/70 00:00      
               OK, there are also other reasons...            01/01/70 00:00      
         so, no purpose at all            01/01/70 00:00      
         Why don't you search first, Ashwin?            01/01/70 00:00      
   LED/lights matrix            01/01/70 00:00      
      actually            01/01/70 00:00      
         I knew there is a better expression...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I understood you!            01/01/70 00:00      
               both are equally right ... it\'s retinal persitence            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s strange...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Number of \"\\\" is doubling, each time I modify!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        some kinda weird escape character            01/01/70 00:00      
   Sorry... (no message)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Which logic?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Lighting logic.            01/01/70 00:00      
         You could have said that earlier!            01/01/70 00:00      
   read \'Hurley\'            01/01/70 00:00      
      :(            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bad ISBN?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Amazon            01/01/70 00:00      
   Two-year-old thread revived!!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List