| ??? 08/02/06 20:16 Read: times |
#121593 - I agree the nomclature could be better Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In actual fact in some documents its called a pseudo-bidirectional port and in others its this silly quasi-bidirectional port when really all it is is a tri-statable bi-directional port. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 80c51 Quasi-Bidirectional I/O ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like this ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree the nomclature could be better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kai? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks! I recall it here:"80C52 port circuitry" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 I/O Port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Diplomacy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's the nomenclature that's the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not call a spade a spade | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the value of a newbie's question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spade a spade Jokes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unwarranted | 01/01/70 00:00 |