| ??? 08/03/06 05:54 Modified: 08/03/06 05:56 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#121606 - Unwarranted Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Charles
I do not see the point you are trying to make out here. Calling a spade a spade or a quasi_bidirectional_port a quasi_bidirectional_port! I do not see the relevance, of your post containing the profanity, with the question. Perhaps a link would be more appropriate. Edit : In fact, I wish to salute Kai for taking the time to give very lucid replies almost whenever a question like this arises. Others tend to refer the person to a book, or a bible, or whatever else.... There are times when a person needs a hand to hold and guide. Jerson |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 80c51 Quasi-Bidirectional I/O ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like this ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I agree the nomclature could be better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kai? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks! I recall it here:"80C52 port circuitry" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 I/O Port | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Diplomacy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's the nomenclature that's the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not call a spade a spade | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the value of a newbie's question | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spade a spade Jokes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Unwarranted | 01/01/70 00:00 |