Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/11/01 22:13
Read: times


 
#12396 - RE: Peters post here
Peter, you bring up a point that is often overlooked; by using several small uCs instead of a big horse, you get code that is modular and MAINTAINABLE. Often in a "big horse product" if you have to change a detail the whole house of cards fall, if you have each subfunction encapsulated in its own micro, there is no ripple effect.

Have fun, go modular

Erik

List of 13 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Peters post here            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List