| ??? 06/27/01 12:03 Read: times |
#12830 - RE: Cygnal Vs. other product |
The principal drawback of Cygnal chips is not his price but his
packaging. A CMS package is good for industrial production, but a mess for prototyping, when you don't have the adequate tools ! This is a shame that no 68 pins PLCC package exists, like a 80C552 super chip. J. M. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Peters post here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Cygnal Vs. other product | 01/01/70 00:00 |