| ??? 09/20/06 21:14 Read: times |
#124723 - could be the problem Responding to: ???'s previous message |
In the simulator
No simulator does it all "as it should" Erik The KBI is unique to the LPC93xx and thus very possibly not simulated very well. What I know of the better simulators, they tend to be close to perfect for the 'standard' '51 features but sometimes lacking in the derivative unique features. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| LPC 9xx Can't clear KBIF | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Turn it off? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I could turn it off | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to turn the KBIF, you have to change the condition | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Erik - I'll give it a go | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| an added comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the rate of change on the input signals? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| nothing of value except the ability to wake up the | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupt for pulse train | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that's basically what the KBI does | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rate of change ~<100kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I did not discuss | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is ok but KBIF is set forever | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that you do not clear the reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I change the state of the pin before | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| could be the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simulators problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Remote Control using AT89C2051 schematic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just great | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another BS answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No BS, I did | 01/01/70 00:00 |