| ??? 01/25/07 14:23 Read: times |
#131468 - are you sure Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It is NOT a case of a delayed one level on the pin.
are you sure based on your post i would agree to "It may NOT be a case of a delayed one level on the pin" What I guessed as a possible reason is still valid (as a matter of fact, once I have seen just that). Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| External Interrupt triggering on initialization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, but..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There's probably a good reason. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worth a shot...but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Understanding interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, I Know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| terse response | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| tried clr IE0... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clr IE ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not use the SILabs deviates, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AH, now we get a good guess at the reason. The ex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe it is the part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are you sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hmmm..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| down memory lane | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
INT0 is assigned to P0.1 as the default | 01/01/70 00:00 |