??? 01/25/07 20:46 Read: times |
#131497 - down memory lane Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Of course, if I do, then someone will probably design a system around that "feature", and blame me when it doesn't work on all derivatives!
Was there not an awwwwful lot of things "using undocumented features" of the original (~1980) PC? When all these 'failed' it was blamed on Intel. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
External Interrupt triggering on initialization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Simple! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yes, but..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
There's probably a good reason. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
worth a shot...but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Understanding interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, I Know | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
terse response | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tried clr IE0... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clr IE ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do not use the SILabs deviates, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Interesting.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AH, now we get a good guess at the reason. The ex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe it is the part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
are you sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hmmm..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hardware bug | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
down memory lane | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
INT0 is assigned to P0.1 as the default![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |