| ??? 02/27/07 11:11 Read: times |
#133786 - packihx, srec_cat Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm not even sure where to start looking for the problem. Please verify that the intel hex is correctly programmed into the T89C51CC02. The addresses within intel hex file generated by SDCC are not always strictly in ascending order and line length varies. Not all programmers/bootloaders like this. If this should be the problem see manual 3.12 "Postprocessing the Intel Hex file" on how to get a more easily digestable intel hex file. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC Compiler questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Need more details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC C Complie Procedure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lose all sign of life? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| code size limited SDCC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| answer to where to get | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| packihx, srec_cat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Following up.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| short/long options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: short/long options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do not recall who it was ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No which or why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: No which or why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if it's not the watchdog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Partial solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just a few more rough ideas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: Interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| function main() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Juergen | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
... and the test ride? | 01/01/70 00:00 |