| ??? 03/24/07 15:11 Read: times |
#135784 - Works!! But is it a solution Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The replacement of caps with the 1M resistor solves the problem and the processor seems stable. I am a little worried however that this is an acceptable solution. Has Atmel responded in any way to this? I notice from your other discussion that this was a revision R component. The processors I am using are also revision R. This is a serious product that I need to release and am a little uncomfortable with simply 'cooking' up a solution that works. Will email Atmel and see what happens. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89S8253 clocking problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The scope probe is the clue!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The tale of a 1000 fingers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alex did what the datasheet demands | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1M across cap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| are you sure it is not 1/3? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had the same problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Works!! But is it a solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is it 1/4 or 1/3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speed unstable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| May be clock amplitude... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Crystal frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An interesting article... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use an external oscillator! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
wait a year or more for the errata | 01/01/70 00:00 |