| ??? 05/19/07 19:47 Read: times |
#139535 - I'm guessing, too Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joe said:
The tradeoff is, it seems to me anyway, is either program in an HLL and reload the whole 128kB, or write in ASM and gain the ability to manipulate individual BYTES of code space.
Of course, I tend to write 805x code in ASM anyway, NOY in HLL, so I could easily be wrong. I can't say for sure one way or the other, but I'd bet that it's possible to coax at least some compilers and/or their associated linkers into doing what the OP needs. -- Russ |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| is DLL like modules possible with 8051 code ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing new... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you choose the right part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the code size is 128kb with banking ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is that this 'new math' I keep hearing about? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How embarassing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| relative cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OP's position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm guessing, too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| see my post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| security issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not landline? that is waaay better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it may be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hooks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with the right chip it can be done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| some, including me, agree . others .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do it in a slightly different way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The "bios" version | 01/01/70 00:00 |