??? 05/19/07 20:21 Read: times |
#139540 - Details Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
then make a separate compile (you may have to include the basics and strip them out) of REAL_func1, locating it at 0x1000
etc. Zackly. The next question, then, is how do you "locate it at 0x1000", and the answer would depend on the particular set of tools being used. Good thing all those compilers come with manuals, eh? -- Russ |
Topic | Author | Date |
is DLL like modules possible with 8051 code ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing new... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If you choose the right part | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the code size is 128kb with banking ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is that this 'new math' I keep hearing about? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How embarassing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
relative cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The real problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OP's position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm guessing, too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
see my post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
security issues | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why not landline? that is waaay better | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it may be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hooks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
with the right chip it can be done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
some, including me, agree . others .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I do it in a slightly different way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The "bios" version![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |