Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/07/07 02:02
Read: times


 
#140366 - Warnings well taken.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Yes all of what you said are quite true. Now that I have many ideas opened up, let me summarize :

- The MCU side code is only to get this parameter list ( from LabVIEW running on a PC )and switch 4 solenoids in sequence based on the four timing values. The four parameters are simply millisecond values. So even with scanf and printf ( yes I also had THAT for debugging ! ) the code size was hardly 3k+. And this interaction with LabVIEW happens once in a few days.

- The possibility of missed characters is minimal as the transfer between LabVIEW and MCU happens after a digital handshake. And having sent out the string, LabVIEW is coded to shout fault if the confirmation of parameter validity is not got from the MCU within 2 seconds.

I came out with the solution in response to a customer requirement that came up after we commissioned the LabVIEW part. Hence I was looking for some quick and easy way to do it.

I am happy I not only got the solutions but also multiple options.

Thanks folks.

Raghu

List of 39 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
String to decimal numbers            01/01/70 00:00      
   Piece of cake            01/01/70 00:00      
      Answer is correct - just do it 4 times!            01/01/70 00:00      
      No, Andy -- Joe\\\'s answer is not correct            01/01/70 00:00      
         simpler????            01/01/70 00:00      
            Simpler            01/01/70 00:00      
               scanf, printf....            01/01/70 00:00      
               scanf()            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Warnings well taken.            01/01/70 00:00      
         My response shows how to do it            01/01/70 00:00      
            the 1-line solution            01/01/70 00:00      
               Now that we\'re being silly ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I'm tempted to give it a "+1 Good answer" :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                  As Cryptic as it can get.. (for me)            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Don't try this at home!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Maybe try at home but NOT with the client !            01/01/70 00:00      
                  all 4 numbers, printf-ed, all in one for            01/01/70 00:00      
                     One small correction            01/01/70 00:00      
                        The world would come to a voilent end.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           this was nothing...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Jan loves C ??? World go KAABOOM!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Jan, you are a wild man!!!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I am cool serious.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I've been learning C too!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              K&R            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 K&R * 3            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    The separation of AWK and Perl duly noted            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I only have the one...            01/01/70 00:00      
   How about...            01/01/70 00:00      
      weekend quiz?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Ok, so it might have been a bit cryptic            01/01/70 00:00      
   Uncanny Adverts            01/01/70 00:00      
      OT - Google magic            01/01/70 00:00      
         Missed concepts..            01/01/70 00:00      
            Be careful            01/01/70 00:00      
               gets() is differently bad            01/01/70 00:00      
                  still better than scanf()            01/01/70 00:00      
                     or, don't bother with the stdlib etc. at all            01/01/70 00:00      
                        for me, replace 'rarely' with 'never'            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List